Using Histograms

1. Histogram in the RAW converter (or "soft is beautiful")

Here is our start image right out of RAW Developer:


Soft image from RAW Developer (Death Valley Zabriskie Point)

Many users get afraid of soft images. But in reality this is likely the best staring point as you have no clipped data and can easily improve it later in Photoshop.

Note: We would have no problem getting closer to our final image also in RAW Developer but our workflow works best with some sort of soft images.

Here is the histogram in RAW Developer (one of the most powerful histograms we have seen):


RAW Developer Histogram

At some point we may feature the RAW Developer histogram by itself but here we want to show the key properties for this image at hand.

1. The "Max" values show no clipping in any of the channels

2. There is a wide gap in the shadows that we have to deal with later

3. RAW Developer allows histograms with 256, 512 and 1024 levels. We normally use 512

This all means we get a 16 bit image in Photoshop that holds all the data in the original file and likely no data clipping at all.

2. Histogram in Photoshop CS2

Here is the histogram of the above image in Photoshop CS2:


Histogram in CS2

This histogram confirms that no data seemed to be clipped.

Unfortunately this histogram setting needs a lot of space on your monitor. One more reason to work in a good dual monitor setup (use your old monitor as the second monitor, we use 2x 1600x1200 displays) or dock the histogram to the top.

Important note: The Photoshop histogram is not always current and may provide a wrong impression of the data. In this case Photoshop shows the following warning:


Warning about histograms not being current

Why is the histogram not current. It would slow Photoshop too much down to recalculate the histograms all the time. Just click on the warning sign and PS recalculates the histograms. Only updated histograms help to make decisions based on the histograms.

Now we run our favorite filter Enhancer on this image (we do this virtually now on all of our images, but also remember that we try to capture scene in soft light):


Enhancer settings

In many cases we use the detail settings at 0. Enhancer still improves the local contrast a lot.

Now lets have a look at the histogram again after we applied Enhancer:


After Enhancer

We make 3 observations:

  • Little bump in the shadows which have not been there (we are not sure that we could really see the effect in the image but want to be sure it does not hurt)
  • Spike in the middle (no ides what it really means)
  • Minor clipping in the red channel (we try to avoid clipping all the time)

After this operation the image and histogram looks like this:


Image after Enhancer


After masking

The image is still soft but with a much better local contrast. Using some sharpening, levels (black & white points and gamma) and an S-curve we get our final image:


Final version


Our final layer stack

Note: We also used an inverse highlight mask for the curves to protect again the highlights from clipping.

We hope to make a good case for the essential use of the Photoshop histogram tool.